Collection management systems

As I mentioned at the start of #blogjune 2014, I’m currently engaged in looking at a new archive management system for the State Records Office of WA. We’ve decided to go with ICA-AtoM  for a number of reasons:

  • the strong link to international standards, not just for archival description, but also for things like dates (yyyy-mm-dd) and describing the size of digital objects (mebibits);
  • the strong community of support for the project, including some fairly significant players like Libraries and Archives Canada;
  • the fact that it’s open source; and,
  • its ability to export data in a range of formats, that we think will help us take advantage of the semantic web and linked data, and will encourage data reuse from the collections.
However, I continue to look at the question of different collection management systems and, in particular, the way in which libraries, archives and museums can link data to create better access to their collections in the aggregate. For this reason, the recent discussions on the Collection Management Linkedin group have caught my eye.  In a series of posts on Museum IO, Shaun Osborne of Cambridge’s Fitzwilliam Museum has provided an historical overview of collection management systems that will be familiar to archivists and other collection managers, and asks questions about the best way to manage linked data, from questions of the use of RDF (resource description framework) to persistent urls and handles for material in collections.  (http://museums-io.org/home/?q=content/museums-and-data-historical-perspective and http://museums-io.org/home/?q=content/museum-data-reality-check-1-rdf).  Rupert Shepherd, a museum registrar, has followed up with an impassioned plea for better documentation http://world.museumsprojekte.de/?p=4023) regardless of the management system. As archivists struggle with the ongoing challenge to make their collections more accessible via digitisation, I am reminded of the plea from a researcher to prioritise description before digitisation, and would suggest that this is a debate that we need to make more public and more urgent.
Advertisements

Published by

inthemailbox

Archivist, historian, avid reader

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s